Question : Correct the following sentence.
The standard person’s conception of systematic method is necessarily faulty in so far as it assumes that hypothesis develops by design from comments of usual events; which are fundamentally unchanged by the preconceptions of the observers.
Option 1: No Change
Option 2: events, which are
Option 3: events, themselves
Option 4: events, these are being changed
Option 5: none of the above
Correct Answer: events, which are
Solution : Notice how this simplified version makes the grammatical error more obvious. The last part of the sentence, following the semicolon, is a dependent clause, because it starts with the pronoun “which.” This makes it wrong to use the semicolon. Only an independent clause - a clause that can stand alone as a sentence - may follow a semicolon. Read what follows the semicolon in this case, and you can probably “hear” that it cannot stand alone as a sentence. To correct it, the connection between the final clause and the rest of the sentence needs to be repaired.
Question : Which scientist revised the nebular hypothesis in 1796?
Question : Directions: Words given on the left side of (::) are related to each other by some Logic/Rule/Relation. Select the missing word pair on the right side of (::) from the given alternatives based on the same Logic/Rule/Relation. Newspaper : Editor ::
Question : Given below are four sentences, three of which, are jumbled. Pick the option that gives the correct order.
A. For example, though there is a close relation between invention and science and engineering, an inventor is not necessarily a scientist or an engineer. B. An
Question : The accessibility to markets is a factor that influences:
Question : In an archaeological report, what would be a primary focus when describing a major Harappan site?
Regular exam updates, QnA, Predictors, College Applications & E-books now on your Mobile