Relation Between Electric Field And Potential

Relation Between Electric Field And Potential

Vishal kumarUpdated on 02 Jul 2025, 05:34 PM IST

Imagine yourself climbing a hill and the effort it takes to move upwards; similarly, in electricity, charges feel this effort or force during their movements in the presence of an electric field. That relation of electric field-containing force, an electric charge experiences with potential energy available at different points, now electric potential, is the reason that backs the functioning of electric circuits and fields. Let us look at the relationship between electric fields and potential, how they interact, and why this understanding is important.

The topic of electric field and potential is important, and in this article, we steady about it. This concept we study in the chapter electrostatics which is a crucial chapter in Class 12th physics and it is a high-wage chapter. It is not only essential for board exams but also for competitive exams like the JEE, NEET, and other entrance exams such as SRMJEE, BITSAT, WBJEE, VITEEE and more. Over the last ten years of the JEE Main exam (from 2013 to 2023), a total of eight questions have been asked on this concept. And for NEET two questions were asked from this concept.

Relation Between Electric Field and Potential

Electric field and potential are related as

$\vec{E}=-\frac{d V}{d r}$

Where E is the Electric field, V is the Electric potential and r is the position vector.

Negative sign indicates that in the direction of intensity, the potential decreases.

If $\vec{r}=x \vec{i}+y \vec{j}+z \vec{k}$
Then,
$
E_x=\frac{\delta V}{d x}, E_y=\frac{\delta V}{d y}, E_z=\frac{\delta V}{d z}
$

where

$\begin{aligned}
& E_x=-\frac{\partial V}{d x} \quad \text { (a partial derivative of } \mathrm{V} \text { w.r.t. } \mathrm{x} \text { ) } \\
& E_y=-\frac{\partial V}{d y} \quad \text { (a partial derivative of } \mathrm{V} \text { w.r.t. y) } \\
& E_x=-\frac{\partial V}{d z} \quad \text { (a partial derivative of } \mathrm{V} \text { w.r.t. } \mathrm{z} \text { ) }
\end{aligned}$

Proof-

Let the Electric field at a point r due to a given mass distribution is E.

If a test charge q is placed inside a uniform Electric field E.

Then force on a charged particle $\mathrm{q}$ when it is at $\mathrm{r}$ is $\vec{F}=q \vec{E}$ as shown in figure

As the particle is displaced from r to r + dr the

work done by the Electric force on it is

$d W=\vec{F} \cdot \vec{r}=q \vec{E} \cdot d \vec{r}$

Electric potential V is defined as the negative of work done by electric force per unit charge

$ d V=-\frac{d W}{q}$

So Integrating between r1, and r2

We get,

$ V\left(\overrightarrow{r_2}\right)-V\left(\overrightarrow{r_1}\right)=\int_{r_1}^{r_2}-\vec{E} \cdot d \vec{r}$

If r1=r0 is taken at the reference point, V(r0) = 0.

Then the potential V(r2=r) at any point r is

$V(\vec{r})=\int_{r_0}^r-\vec{E} \cdot d \vec{r}$

in Cartesian coordinates, we can write

$\begin{aligned}
& \vec{E}=E_x \vec{i}+E_y \vec{j}+E_z \vec{k} \\
& \text { If } \vec{r}=x \vec{i}+y \vec{j}+z \vec{k}
\end{aligned}$

Then,

$ d \vec{r}=d x \vec{i}+d y \vec{j}+d z \vec{k}$

So

$\begin{gathered}
\vec{E} . d \vec{r}=-d V=E_x d x+E_y d y+E_z d z \\
d V=-E_x d x-E_y d y-E_z d z
\end{gathered}$

If y and z remain constant, dy = dz = 0

Thus

$
E_x=\frac{d V}{d x}
$

Similarly
$
E_y=\frac{d V}{d y}, E_z=\frac{d V}{d z}
$

  • When an electric field is uniform (constant)

The electric field and potential are related as $\quad d V=\int_{r_0}^r-\vec{E} \cdot d \vec{r}$
and $\mathrm{E}=$ constant then
$
d V=-\vec{E} \int_{r_0}^r d \vec{r}=-\vec{E} d r
$

  • If at any region E = 0 then V = constant
  • If V = 0 then E may or may not be zero.

For More Information On Relation Between Electric Field And Potential, Watch The Below Video:

Solved Example Based On Relation Between Electric Field And Potential

Example 1: The potential at a point $x$ (measured in $\mu m$ ) due to some charges situated on the $x$-axis is given by:
$$
V(x)=20 /\left(x^2-4\right) \text { volt } .
$$

$\text { The electric field } E \text { at } x=4 \mu m \text { is given by }$

1) (10/9)volt/ $\mu \mathrm{m}$ and in the + ve $x$ direction
2) $(5 / 3)$ volt/ $\mu \mathrm{m}$ and in the $-v e x$ direction
3) $(5 / 3)$ volt $/ \mu \mathrm{m}$ and in the + ve $x$ direction
4) (10/9)volt/ $\mu \mathrm{m}$ in the - ve $x$ direction

Solution:

As we learnt in

Relation between field and potential -

$
E=\frac{-d V}{d r}
$
- wherein
$\frac{d V}{d r}-\underset{\text { Potential gradient. }}{ }$
Electric field $E=\frac{-d V}{d x}=\frac{-d}{d x}\left(\frac{20}{x^2-4}\right)=\frac{40 x}{\left(x^2-4\right)^2}$
At $x=4 \mu m$
$
\therefore \quad E=\frac{40 \times 4}{[16-4]^2}=\frac{160}{144}=\frac{10}{9} \mathrm{~V} / \mu \mathrm{m}
$

Positive signs indicate E is in the +ve x direction

Hence, the answer is option (1).

Example 2: Two charges +q and -q are situated at a certain distance. At the point exactly midway between them

1)Electric field and potential both are zero

2)The electric field is zero but the potential is not zero

3)The electric field is not zero but the potential is zero

4)Neither electric field nor potential is zero

Solution:

If at any point $E=0$ -
$\mathrm{V}=$ constant
At $O, E \neq 0, V=0$

Hence, the answer is option (3).

Example 3: A uniform electric field having a magnitude $E_0$ and direction along the positive $X$-axis exists. If the electric potential $V$, is zero at $X=0$, then, its value at $X=+x$ will be:

1) $V(X)=+X E_0$
2) $V(X)=-X E_0$
3) $V(X)=X^2 E_0$
4) ${ }_{} V(X)=-X^2 E_0$

Solution:

As we learned

In space -

$
E_x=\frac{-d v}{d x} \quad E_y=\frac{-d v}{d y} \quad E_z=\frac{-d v}{d z}
$

By using
$
E=-\frac{\Delta V}{\Delta r}=-\frac{\left(V_2-V_1\right)}{\left(r_2-r_1\right)} ; E_0=\frac{\{V(x)-0\}}{x-0} \Rightarrow V(x)=-x E_0
$

Hence, the answer is option (2).

Example 4: If the electric potential at any point $(\mathrm{x}, \mathrm{y}, \mathrm{z}) \mathrm{m}_{\text {in }}$ space is given by $\mathrm{V}=3 \mathrm{x}^2$ volt. |The electric field at the point $(1,0,3) \mathrm{m}$ will be :

1) $3 \mathrm{Vm}^{-1}$, directed along positive $x$-axis,
2) $3 \mathrm{Vm}^{-1}$, directed along negative $x$-axis.
3) $6 \mathrm{Vm}^{-1}$, directed along positive $x$-axis.
4) $6 \mathrm{Vm}^{-1}$, directed along negative $x$-axis.

Solution:

$\begin{aligned}
& \mathrm{V}=3 \mathrm{x}^2 \\
& \mathrm{E}=\frac{-\mathrm{dv}}{\mathrm{dx}}=-6 \mathrm{x} \\
& \vec{E}=-6 x \hat{\imath} \\
& \text { at }(1,0,3) \\
& \vec{E}=-6 \hat{\imath}
\end{aligned}$

Hence, the answer is option (4).

Example 5: Some equipotential surfaces are shown in the figure. The magnitude and direction of the electric field is

1) 100 V/m making angle 120o with the x-axis

2) 100 V/m making angle 60o with the x-axis

3) 200 V/m making angle 120o with the x-axis

4) None of the above

Solution:

As we learned

For Positive charge -

An electric field line comes out.

By using $d V=E d r \cos \theta$ suppose we consider line 1 and line 2 then
$
(30-20)=E \cos 60^{\circ}(20-10) \times 10^{-2}
$

So
$E=200 \mathrm{volt} / \mathrm{m}$ making in angle $120^{\circ}$ with $x$-axis

Hence, the answer is option (3).

Summary

That is, the electric field will be the force per unit charge experienced by a charged particle in a field; therefore, electric potential is usually expressed as the energy per unit charge at a point in the field. That is, the electric field will be related to an electric potential given by the relation of a field pointing toward a maximum decrease in potential. It is mathematically the negative gradient of electric potential. This enables us to study and design electrical systems and learn about the behaviour of charges in fields.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Q: What is the significance of Laplace's equation in electrostatics, and how does it relate to potential?
A:
Laplace's equation (∇²V = 0) describes the electric potential in charge
Q: How does the concept of electric potential energy relate to the work done by non-conservative forces in an electric circuit?
A:
In an electric circuit, the work done by non-conservative forces (like those in a battery) maintains a potential difference. This work is converted to electric potential energy of charges as they move through the circuit. The potential difference across circuit elements relates to the change in potential energy per unit charge. Understanding this relationship is crucial for analyzing energy transfer and conservation in electrical systems.
Q: What is the significance of the work-energy theorem in electrostatics?
A:
The work-energy theorem in electrostatics states that the work done by electrostatic forces on a charge equals the change in its electric potential energy. This theorem connects the concepts of work, electric field, and potential. It's expressed as W = -ΔU = qΔV, where W is work, U is potential energy, q is charge, and V is potential. This relationship is fundamental for understanding energy conservation in electrostatic systems.
Q: How does the concept of electric flux relate to both electric field and potential?
A:
Electric flux is the measure of the electric field passing through a given surface. While it's directly related to the electric field, it also connects to electric potential. The flux through a closed surface is proportional to the enclosed charge (Gauss's law), which in turn determines the potential distribution. Understanding flux helps in visualizing field patterns and is crucial for applying Gauss's law to find fields and potentials for symmetric charge distributions.
Q: Can there be a situation where the electric potential is zero everywhere but the electric field is non-zero?
A:
No, if the electric potential is zero everywhere, the electric field must also be zero everywhere. This is because the electric field is the negative gradient of the potential (E = -∇V). If the potential is uniformly zero, its gradient (and thus the field) must be zero. However, it's possible to have regions of zero potential in a system where the field is non-zero elsewhere.
Q: How does the behavior of electric potential and field near a charged infinite plane compare to that near a point charge?
A:
Near a charged infinite plane, the electric field is constant (independent of distance) and perpendicular to the plane, while the potential varies linearly with distance. This contrasts with a point charge, where the field decreases as 1/r² and the potential as 1/r. Understanding these differences is crucial for analyzing various charge distributions and their effects on surrounding space.
Q: How does the method of images relate to electric fields and potentials?
A:
The method of images is a problem-solving technique in electrostatics where a complex problem involving conductors is replaced by an equivalent problem with additional "image" charges. This method preserves the boundary conditions for electric potential and field. It's particularly useful for problems involving point charges near conducting planes or spheres, simplifying the calculation of potentials and fields in these geometries.
Q: What is the physical meaning of the divergence of the electric field, and how does it relate to potential?
A:
The divergence of the electric field (∇ · E) represents the source density of the field. In electrostatics, it's proportional to the charge density (Gauss's law in differential form). While divergence directly relates to the field, it also connects to the potential through Poisson's equation (∇²V = -ρ/ε₀), which relates the Laplacian of the potential to charge density. Understanding divergence helps in analyzing charge distributions and their effects on fields and potentials.
Q: How does the principle of electrostatic shielding relate to electric fields and potentials?
A:
Electrostatic shielding occurs when a conductor surrounds a region, protecting it from external electric fields. Inside the shielded region, both the electric field and the potential are constant (usually zero). This principle is based on the behavior of conductors in electrostatic equilibrium and the fact that excess charge resides on the surface of conductors. Understanding shielding is crucial for designing electronic devices and understanding phenomena like the Faraday cage.
Q: What is the significance of the uniqueness theorem in electrostatics?
A:
The uniqueness theorem in electrostatics states that if we know the potential on all boundaries of a region and the charge distribution within it, there is only one possible solution for the potential (and thus the field) in that region. This theorem is crucial for problem-solving in electrostatics, as it assures us that if we find a solution satisfying the boundary conditions, it must be the correct and only solution.